That is how I usually flow, it doesn’t make me loved or at times even appreciated, but that is me, oversimplifying problems on the handle, or is that off the handle? So whilst I was watching the BS wannabe influencers going all out on Elon Musk and Grok. There are two settings. The first is some have a case, but others do not, they are all out to get the maximum out of Grok (and its owner). I tend to take a less obvious course of action. You see, what everyone is ‘ignoring’ (intentional or not) is that AI doesn’t yet exist. So this is all DML and with an optional setting of LLM. And they are powerful tools, but they are programmed and that is what some want to avoid looking at. The programmer has no or little wealth and in law Torts tells us to go after the money and that was a fact long before Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 AC 562. And that setting is still used today, where these plaintiffs go after the money. Yet I am of a different stroke. I want the issue stopped. One thing to do this is to use the risen of nonrepudiation. You and only you could have done this. So we address that in the software, there are legitimate reasons and non-legitimate reasons and ALL have to submit there data and whilst that is done, (not unlike Meta) we capture all the data we can as such we have a batter of data and it is connected to (or imbedded) into the picture, but that is not enough. The provider keeps a copy of the image with a hidden watermark (an encryption technique I designed for other reasons) and that goes with every picture. It is there hidden and that is how nonrepudiation works. We might not prevent a lot, but now we can do something about it, not tomorrow, not next week or next year. But now. And the people who don’t want to do that, they can find another solution. But this fleecing Elon Musk and whatever company he has now needs to stop because those who want to go the ‘Torts’ way are part of the problem and not part of the solution. This is how I see it.
And lets be clear, some actions like ‘nudifying’ a famous person is wrong, even if you are the husband. And lets be clear, that act is also set to a 90% likely that you are not capturing the whole and correct image, so there is that too. And weirdly enough there are plenty of start showing off their priceless pairs in fashion shows (example: Olivia Wilde) and they are ‘willing’ to do that, so save that picture for all its worth, but leave the others alone. Now, I get it, there is always a horny teenager that wants to show off that ‘he’ and ‘he’ alone was ‘given’ an image from his star and showing this off to his friends (who are likely using the same solution) and they have their own starlet, its like the Generation Alpha version on who has the biggest dick.
And when they realise what they have done, that usually comes when their wives are giving birth to a daughter, reality hits. That is in 15 years and something needs to be done now, as such add nonrepudiation to this equation makes people wonder what to do. Some will wipe the image, but if the provider have the copy and connected data that will not be enough. When the hidden data is added to whatever that person gives is verified, we see the first red flags erupt and that is how the game is changed and those ‘privacy’ geeks out there, there is no privacy on nudifying images and as such the woman in question gets to have the right to prosecute and the maker of the image is to be prosecuted, not Elon Musk, Not Grok because there is a whole range of reasons why a filter was created, some are funny (like the Shrek faces on everyone in a video) and a few others, some filters are there to correct like remove dopey dodger photobombing away from a photo, but to remove clothing from a person is not.
There is a likelihood of me missing out on a few items and that is fine but the setting I needed to give is here, we need to prosecute and shame the ones doing the deed, that is overlooked by pretty much all the writers of the anti-Grok brigade. None of them is holding these people to account and adding nonrepudiation is doing just that, taking care of the culprits and those mommies and daddies saying that they were merely kids having fun need to realise that there is no innocence in that setting, they failed as educators.
So have a great day and consider what can happen when we go after the transgressors.
Lawrence van Rijn - Law Lord to be 