Tag Archives: WLFI

I get that, I cannot look at everything, so I need to choose. I saw something that caught Mme off guard and left me baffled, not because it looked amazing, but under the hood, the questionable actions of scientists making a remarkable short sighted setting, it was AI reporting on AI and the downsides that it gives us all and it is all smitten with an amazing story that had me baffled and if this mockumentary makes it to a real $K disc, it might be a dead set winner for Oscars and other bling bling of an entertaining nature. It is called Reconstructing the Divine, it comes from Black Eye Media AB and is directed by Jakob Soe-Pedersen and I quite honestly left me baffled. There is a story under that story. I wonder if you can see it too, so look it up on YouTube. 

This story is about something else. Crypto News (at https://cryptonews.com.au/news/senate-democrats-demand-probe-into-trump-family-crypto-ventures-uae-links-134100/) gives us ‘Senate Democrats Demand Probe Into Trump Family Crypto Venture’s UAE Links’ it was also given to us by The Australian, but that paper merely pushes us to a payment link, so I use the other one. And in short we see:

• Senate Democrats are seeking hearings into a reported US$500 million (AU$710 million) UAE-backed investment in World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture linked to the Trump family.
• Lawmakers are examining whether the investment and subsequent US policy decisions involving AI chip exports to the UAE could present conflicts of interest or national security concerns.
• Donald Trump has denied involvement in the transaction, saying he was unaware of the investment and does not participate in the company’s daily operations.

It gives us a few things, among them “Senate Democrats are pressing Republican leaders to hold hearings into reported financial links between the Trump family’s crypto venture, World Liberty Financial (WLFI), and an Abu Dhabi investment vehicle associated with Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The lawmakers argue that the matter raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and implications for US national security.” And “According to reports cited by lawmakers, an investment vehicle backed by Sheikh Tahnoon acquired a 49% stake in WLFI through a deal valued at US$500 million (AU$710 million). The agreement was reportedly signed by Eric Trump on 16 January 2025, four days before Donald Trump’s inauguration.”

The question becomes, are illegalities a fact? We are given that that this all happened 4 days before inauguration and as his son (allegedly) might be involved, nothing sticks to the president, other settings are stated that are linked to Jared Kushner who is facing sweeping congressional investigations and public scrutiny primarily regarding severe conflicts of interest and potential ethics and legal violations stemming from his foreign business dealings, but these are mere accusations, still nothing is sticking to President Trump and whilst I might not like the man, I still believe in the law and the law predominantly is about ‘What you can prove in court’ and until that moment the person is innocent until proven guilty. I don’t go with these Democratic haters and anti-Trumpetists (its that an actual word?) What dos matter is that there is yet another investigation into the Trump family. Another setting is that we are also given “an Abu Dhabi investment vehicle associated with Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The lawmakers argue that the matter raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and implications for US national security.” Is this a mere lose accusation? I find the use of “investment vehicle”, which is loosely set to a non-liable stage, which implies that there is no evidence of wrong doing and the connection to the name “Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan” who is the national security advisor for the UAE and the brother of President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, this all sounds like sexy media and the wet dream of Geraldo (is he still alive?) But were any wrongdoings done from the UAE point of view? So whilst we get “Lawmakers said US$250 million (AU$355 million) was paid upfront, with approximately US$187 million (AU$265.5 million) going to Trump family-linked entities and more than US$31 million (AU$44 million) directed to entities connected to WLFI co-founder Steve Witkoff’s family. Witkoff’s son, Zach Witkoff, currently serves as the company’s chief executive.” It is here we see “Trump family-linked entities”, the question becomes who and did they break any laws? Then we get “directed to entities connected to WLFI co-founder Steve Witkoff’s” who are they and did they break any laws? Simple questions that this article and I am guessing the Australian does not answer either (which is a speculation by this blogger). So what does the article do except give us unsubstantiated rumors and a setting for enhancing distrust. Because if it quacks like a duck it is a duck, but a Wood Frog also quacks, so how about that setting? 

Will we get actual newspapers to give us the goods on what could have been illegal but what was perfectly legal? And in all this, were any laws broken in the UAE? All questions and no answers. I wonder how a non journalist (that would be me) has the larger active focus on what the journalists should be seeing and this is why journalists hunting digital dollars are basically a menace to society. This might not be totally accurate, but that is what I have been seeing and noticing these last few years. So you all have a great day and consider to look at what are the facts of a case, not what the press is implying.